<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tommyam.com &#187; NFL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tommyam.com/category/nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tommyam.com</link>
	<description>Version 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NFL Picks &#8211; Conference Championships</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/nfl-picks-conference-championships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/nfl-picks-conference-championships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So my plan to track my gambling all season fell apart.  I got killed early, went to New Zealand for a couple weeks, and never got back into it.  Figure I was down somewhere in the neighborhood of $400-600 bucks after 3 weeks.  In order to redeem myself, I&#8217;m laying down a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So my plan to track my gambling all season fell apart.  I got killed early, went to New Zealand for a couple weeks, and never got back into it.  Figure I was down somewhere in the neighborhood of $400-600 bucks after 3 weeks.  In order to redeem myself, I&#8217;m laying down a big one this week:</p>
<p>$1,000 &#8211; Cardinals (+4) over Eagles.  This line opened at +3 and CREPT UP.  I can&#8217;t believe it.  This is a huge gift to every NFL gambler.  The Cardinals have what it takes to cover this at home.</p>
<p>So if this shakes out the way I think, I will be vindicated and up for the season.  If not, I will not fake-gamble on the NFL anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/nfl-picks-conference-championships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Its on Like Donkey Kong</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/its-on-like-donkey-kong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/its-on-like-donkey-kong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank to Mr. Territo for hooking this one. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank to Mr. Territo for hooking this one. </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FNiwJIrFCP8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FNiwJIrFCP8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2009/01/16/its-on-like-donkey-kong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Week 4 Picks &#8211; Getting Back Up to Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/27/nfl-week-4-picks-getting-back-up-to-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/27/nfl-week-4-picks-getting-back-up-to-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/27/nfl-week-4-picks-getting-back-up-to-speed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got shelled again last week.&#160; If you are new to NFL gambling, be aware that your most profitable time, the first two weeks of the season, is followed by the most dangerous time, the next 4 weeks of the season.&#160; You have assumptions built on assumptions of the first two weeks get totally shattered in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got shelled again last week.&nbsp; If you are new to NFL gambling, be aware that your most profitable time, the first two weeks of the season, is followed by the most dangerous time, the next 4 weeks of the season.&nbsp; You have assumptions built on assumptions of the first two weeks get totally shattered in the following weeks.&nbsp; Case in point for two teams: Popular NFL wisdom right now is that the Texans are pretty bad and the Raven are pretty good.&nbsp; Due to their Week 2 BYE&#8217;s, we really have no idea if either of these are the case &#8211; so tread lightly.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Top Picks: 0-2, -$200<br />Solid Picks: 2-4, -$120<br />Crap Picks:&nbsp; 4-4, $0</p>
<p>Week 3 Total: 6-10, -$320</p>
<p>Season Total: 23-22, -$250</p>
<p><b>Picks of Week</b></p>
<p>Cleveland (+3.5) at Cincinnati<br />I have a strong feeling about this one.&nbsp; Cleveland has so much more to prove and can win the toughness battle.&nbsp; The Bengals are just godawful.<br />Cleveland &#8211; $100</p>
<p>San Diego (-7.5) at Oakland<br />This line opened at even odds and has crept up a concerning amount.&nbsp; Gamblers everywhere are look for the Bolts to put up a big division win on the road.&nbsp; Let me whisper something to you guys betting big on the Bolts: *San Diego stinks.*<br />Oakland &#8211; $100</p>
<p><b>Solid Picks</b></p>
<p>Buffalo (+8) at St. Louis<br />St. Louis has yet to not disappoint.<br />Buffalo &#8211; $50</p>
<p>San Francisco (+5) at New Orleans<br />A pass-happy offensive team playing against a team with a mediocre secondary in a dome?&nbsp; Yes, the 49&#8242;ers are for real and they win this one outright.<br />San Fran &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Philadelphia (+3) at Chicago<br />You are teling me that Chicago is better than Pittsburgh?&nbsp; Eagles&#8217; D goes nuts.<br />Philly &#8211; $70</p>
<p><b>Crap Picks<br /></b><br />Baltimore (+5.5) at Pittsburgh<br />Vegas has no appreciation of history.&nbsp; Two field goals is a big line.<br />Ravens &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Minnesota (+3) at Tennessee<br />Minnesota (wins outright) &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Green Bay (+1) at Tampa Bay<br />Tampa Bay &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Arizona (+1.5) at Jets<br />Jets &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Houston (+7) at Jacksonville<br />Jacksonville &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Denver (+9.5) at KC<br />Denver &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Washington (+11) at Dallas<br />Dallas &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Atlanta (+7) at Carolina<br />Carolina &#8211; $10</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/27/nfl-week-4-picks-getting-back-up-to-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Week 3 Picks &#8211; My Overconfidence Was My Weakness</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/19/nfl-week-3-picks-my-overconfidence-was-my-weakness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/19/nfl-week-3-picks-my-overconfidence-was-my-weakness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/19/nfl-week-3-picks-my-overconfidence-was-my-weakness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got crushed, just crushed last week.
Top Picks: 2-3, -$130 Middle Picks: 2-2, $0Crap Picks: 4-1, +$30
All picks last week:&#160; 8-6, -$100
Season Total: 17-12, +$70
Pick of the Week
Pittsburgh (+3.5) at Philly3.5 is a magic number, a FG doesn&#8217;t win it.&#160; I love the Steelers and I think they may actually play some defense in this game, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got crushed, just crushed last week.</p>
<p>Top Picks: 2-3, -$130 <br />Middle Picks: 2-2, $0<br />Crap Picks: 4-1, +$30</p>
<p>All picks last week:&nbsp; 8-6, -$100</p>
<p>Season Total: 17-12, +$70</p>
<p><b>Pick of the Week</b></p>
<p>Pittsburgh (+3.5) at Philly<br />3.5 is a magic number, a FG doesn&#8217;t win it.&nbsp; I love the Steelers and I think they may actually play some defense in this game, unlike Dallas against Philly last week.&nbsp; This is tough test #1 for Pittsburgh on the road to the playoffs.<br />Pittsburgh &#8211; $100</p>
<p>NO (+5.5) at Denver<br />
So the team that gets beat by the Campbell-Moss combo is losing by less than a touchdown to the Cutler-Marshall combo on the road?<br />
Denver &#8211; $100</p>
<p><b>Solid Picks</b></p>
<p>Jacksonville (+5) at Indy<br />This is a tough line for this game, but I think Indy blows them out.&nbsp; Peyton carried that team last week and Jacksonville is much, much worse than most people realize.<br />Indy &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Dallas (+3) at Green Bay<br />This line opened at even money and I wish I had jumped on it sooner.&nbsp; This is a make-up game for Dallas from Monday night&#8217;s debacle.&nbsp; Look for their secondary to play with renewed intensity, in an effort to make up for nearly giving away the game to McNabb.<br />Dallas &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Houston (+4.5) at Tennessee<br />I predict that the announcers at the end of this game will be saying something like: &#8220;Do you know who the real winners are?&nbsp; The people of Houston and Galveston.&#8221;<br />Houston &#8211; $70</p>
<p>KC (+5.5) at Atlanta<br />KC has shown me nothing.&nbsp; NOTHING!<br />Atlanta &#8211; $50</p>
<p>Cleveland (+2.5) at Baltimore<br />
The slide ends here.<br />
Cleveland &#8211; $50</p>
<p>NY Jets (+9) at San Diego<br />Two forces pushing here &#8211; San Diego can&#8217;t be 0-3 and Farve can&#8217;t lose in front of a big audience.&nbsp; I think the Jets keep it closer than 9.<br />Jets &#8211; $50</p>
<p><b>Crap Picks<br /></b><br />Oakland (-9.5) at Buffalo<br />This line scares me off.<br />Buffalo &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Tampa Bay (+3) at Chicago<br />I have Earnest Graham in fantasy, so I pray.&nbsp; If you don&#8217;t have to, don&#8217;t bet on this game!<br />Tampa &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Miami (+12.5) at New England<br />
Coach Sweatpants will run up the score.&nbsp; Pats D will score.&nbsp; It will get ugly, but two touchdowns ugly?<br />
New England &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Bengals (+13) at NY Giants<br />Line seems about right.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s call it two touchdowns.<br />Giants &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Arizona (+3) at Washington<br />
Washington isn&#8217;t that good&#8230; but I said that last week.<br />
Washington &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Carolina (+3.5) at Minnesota<br />Minnesota &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Detroit (+4) at San Fran<br />San Fran &#8211; $10</p>
<p>St. Louis (+9.5) at Seattle<br />St. Louis &#8211; $10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/19/nfl-week-3-picks-my-overconfidence-was-my-weakness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Week 2 Picks &#8211; Sitting Pretty</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/12/nfl-week-2-picks-sitting-pretty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/12/nfl-week-2-picks-sitting-pretty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/12/nfl-week-2-picks-sitting-pretty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before we get into picks this week, let&#8217;s go over how badly I slaughtered Vegas last week:
Top Picks: 3-0, +$220 Middle Picks: 3-3, -$30Upset Picks: 0-2, -$40Questionable Picks: 3-1, +$20
All picks last week:&#160; 9-6, +$170
Not too shabby.&#160; Outside of my top picks, my analysis was pretty terrible &#8211; but I also don&#8217;t want to spend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get into picks this week, let&#8217;s go over how badly I slaughtered Vegas last week:</p>
<p>Top Picks: 3-0, +$220 <br />Middle Picks: 3-3, -$30<br />Upset Picks: 0-2, -$40<br />Questionable Picks: 3-1, +$20</p>
<p>All picks last week:&nbsp; 9-6, +$170</p>
<p>Not too shabby.&nbsp; Outside of my top picks, my analysis was pretty terrible &#8211; but I also don&#8217;t want to spend all day thinking about every matchup.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s get into next week:</p>
<p><b><br />Picks of the week</b></p>
<p>Atlanta (+7) at Tampa Bay<br />Really?&nbsp; This line is really 7?&nbsp; After Tampa Bay lost to the Saints like that on Sunday?&nbsp; Were the bookmakers watching the same game that I was?&nbsp; Both of these teams run a ton, is Greise really going to come in and run up the score?&nbsp; <br />Atlanta &#8211; $100</p>
<p>New Orleans (EVEN) at Washington<br />
Is Washington going to be like last year&#8217;s Patriots, except the<br />
opposite, in that they are going to be giving too few points, week<br />
after week?&nbsp; This line should be -7.&nbsp; Also, the over/under is 42, I<br />
smell a tease with the under here, because THE SKINS HAVE NO OFFENSE.<br />
New Orleans &#8211; $100</p>
<p><b>Solid Picks</p>
<p></b>New England (+1.5) at NY Jets<b><br /></b>There are 10 other players on the field.<br />New England &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Buffalo (+5.5) at Jacksonville<br />I think it is reasonable to say that Jacksonville will not run wild on Buffalo.&nbsp; Again, it is as if nobody watched last week&#8217;s games.&nbsp; This spread should be about +1.<br />Buffalo &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Philadelphia (+7) at Dallas<br />If this was at +6, it would be a lock of the week.&nbsp; <br />Dallas &#8211; $70</p>
<p><b>Middle Picks</b></p>
<p>NY Giants (-8.5) at St. Louis<br />I can&#8217;t  trust that the Rams are THAT bad, and they are at home.&nbsp; <br />St. Louis &#8211; $30</p>
<p>Tennessee (+1.5) at Cincinnati<br />Kerry Collins !&lt; Vince Young.<br />Tennessee &#8211; $30</p>
<p>Miami (+6.5) at Arizona<br />
Line seems high, Pennington is a loser, but a player.&nbsp; He is a &#8220;tough win&#8221;.<br />
Miami &#8211; $30<br /><b><br /></b>San Diego (-1) at Denver<br />
Denver at home + San Diego is overrated.&nbsp; Denver wins outright, has coming out party as the best team in the West.<br />
Denver &#8211; $30</p>
<p>Baltimore (+4.5) at Houston<br />This might be my last week of faith in the Texans.&nbsp; They really should win this by 6+.<br />Houston &#8211; $30<br /><b></p>
<p>Crap Picks</b></p>
<p>Chicago (+3) at Carolina<br />
Carolina offense is going nuts.&nbsp; <br />
Carolina &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Green Bay (-3) at Detroit<br />Is Detroit really as good as Minnesota, because that what this line tells me.&nbsp; Maybe, but I&#8217;m sticking with the Pack.<br />Green Bay &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Indianapolis (+1.5) at Minnesota<br />I&#8217;d like to think that Indy is much better than the Vikings, but I&#8217;m not willing to bet on it.<br />Indy &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Oakland (-3.5) at Kansas City<br />This game opened at even odds.&nbsp; It should have stayed that way.&nbsp; The thought of watching this games makes me throw up a little.<br />Oakland &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Pittsburgh (-6) at Cleveland<br />It might storm at game time, thus not a solid pick.&nbsp; Seriously.<br />Pittsburgh &#8211; $10</p>
<p>San Fran (+7) at Seattle<br />This opened at +9, and is still too high.<br />San Fran &#8211; $10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/12/nfl-week-2-picks-sitting-pretty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Week 1 Picks &#8211; The Week That Vegas Forgot</title>
		<link>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/03/nfl-week-1-picks-the-week-that-vegas-forgot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/03/nfl-week-1-picks-the-week-that-vegas-forgot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommyam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/03/nfl-week-1-picks-the-week-that-vegas-forgot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am going to try to start picking games each week.  In some capacity, I have been picking games for fun and profit for the past decade or so, so I thought this year it would be fun to take on Vegas. 
Here are my ground rules:1.  Line is based on when I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to try to start picking games each week.  In some capacity, I have been picking games for fun and profit for the past decade or so, so I thought this year it would be fun to take on Vegas. </p>
<p>Here are my ground rules:<br />1.  Line is based on when I make the picks.  I get the line from <a target="_blank" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/odds">Yahoo</a>.<br />2.  I have to place a bet on every game.  Bets can be from $10 &#8211; $100, based on how strongly I feel about the difference between the line and the potential outcome.  Ties are a push.<br />3.  I won&#8217;t actually be placing any bets &#8211; you need to gamble at your own risk.  </p>
<p>I will keep track of week-to-week earnings.  Let&#8217;s get into Week 1:<b></p>
<p></b>The trick with gambling on the NFL is to strike early, before anyone (particularly Vegas) has any idea what is going on.  A few lines will jump out in the first few weeks for being completely crazy &#8211; I have always exploited that.</p>
<p><b><br />Pick of the week</b></p>
<p>Dallas (-5.5) at Cleveland<br />You are given the keys to a Dodge Viper.  The first time you drive it, don&#8217;t you take it on the highway and push it a little bit?  The Cowboys are that Viper and in Week 1, they will open it up in Cleveland, just a little bit.  This line is silly low, Dallas will win by 9+.<br />$100 &#8211; Dallas</p>
<p><b>Solid Picks</p>
<p></b>Denver (-3) at Oakland<br />Denver is more than three points better than Oakland right now.  Oakland is a case study on how not to run an NFL Franchise.  Why don&#8217;t they try to improve?  <br />$50 &#8211; Denver</p>
<p>Washington (+4) at NY Giants<br />If Washington can stay in this and establish the run, then they have a good shot at keeping it close.  They have a great offensive line and a good defense.  However, the passing offense has looked terrible thus far.  If they get down two scores, there will be blood in the water and the Giants will swarm.  Look for Eli and his crew to jump to an early lead and look for a 3rd quarter collapse from the &#8216;Skins trying to play catch-up.<br />$70 &#8211; NYG</p>
<p><b>The Middle Picks</b></p>
<p>These lines seem low:</p>
<p>Detroit (-3) at Atlanta<br />Detroit &#8211; $20</p>
<p>Jacksonville (-3) at Tennessee<br />Jacksonville &#8211; $40</p>
<p>Tampa Bay (+3) at New Orleans<br />New Orleans &#8211; $20</p>
<p>These seem high:</p>
<p>Chicago (+9.5) at Indianapolis <br />Chicago &#8211; $20</p>
<p>St. Louis (+7.5) at Philadelphia<br />St. Louis &#8211; $30</p>
<p>Carolina (+9) at San Diego<br />Carolina &#8211; $20</p>
<p><b>Upset Picks</p>
<p></b>NY Jets (-3) at Miami<br />Miami will run like a train on the Jets.  Favre will blow it with one or two key INT&#8217;s.<br />Miami &#8211; $20</p>
<p>Minnesota (+2.5) at Green Bay<br />Minnesota will run like a train on the Packers.  The ghost of Brett Favre will blow it with one or two key INT&#8217;s.<br />Minnesota &#8211; $20</p>
<p><b>Questionable Picks</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to think too much about these games.</p>
<p>Houston (+6.5) at Pittsburgh<br />Pittsburgh wins, but by a TD?  Houston is secretly very good &#8211; they are this year&#8217;s Browns.<br />Pittsburgh &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Arizona (-2.5) at SF<br />Yuck.<br />Arizona &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Seattle (+1) at Buffalo<br />Yuck-er<br />Seattle &#8211; $10</p>
<p>Cincinnati (-1.5) at Baltimore<br />Yuck-est<br />Baltimore &#8211; $10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommyam.com/2008/09/03/nfl-week-1-picks-the-week-that-vegas-forgot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
